In recent years, the higher education landscape has seen a shift towards a greater focus on credit mobility, with many institutions and policymakers advocating for smoother transfer processes for students between different colleges and universities. This has sparked a debate about whether solving credit mobility issues requires retiring the completion agenda, which emphasizes increasing graduation rates and ensuring students complete their degrees in a timely manner.
The completion agenda has been a central focus of higher education policy in the United States for the past decade, with institutions and policymakers aiming to increase the number of students who successfully complete their degrees. This emphasis on completion has led to a number of initiatives aimed at streamlining pathways to graduation, such as guided pathways programs and competency-based education.
While the completion agenda has had some success in increasing graduation rates, it has also been criticized for potentially limiting opportunities for credit mobility. Students who transfer between institutions often face barriers such as credit loss, unclear transfer policies, and lack of coordination between institutions. These challenges can result in delays in completing a degree or even discouraging students from transferring at all.
On the other hand, advocates for credit mobility argue that focusing on improving transfer processes and ensuring that credits are easily transferable between institutions is essential for promoting equity and access in higher education. By facilitating credit mobility, students can more easily pursue their educational goals, whether that involves transferring to a four-year institution, completing a degree at a community college, or taking courses at multiple institutions to meet their needs.
So, does solving credit mobility require retiring the completion agenda? The answer is not necessarily. Both goals are important for ensuring that students have access to high-quality education and are able to complete their degrees in a timely manner. However, it is essential that institutions and policymakers strike a balance between these two priorities.
One way to do this is by integrating credit mobility efforts into the completion agenda. This could involve developing more seamless transfer pathways, aligning curriculum between institutions, and providing better support services for transfer students. By addressing the challenges of credit mobility within the framework of the completion agenda, institutions can ensure that students have the support they need to complete their degrees while also providing them with opportunities to transfer and continue their education.
In conclusion, solving credit mobility does not necessarily require retiring the completion agenda. Both goals are important for promoting student success and ensuring equitable access to higher education. By incorporating credit mobility efforts into the completion agenda, institutions can better support transfer students and provide them with the opportunities they need to achieve their educational goals.
0
0
