Wiley to Shutter 19 Journals

Read Time:1 Minute, 39 Second

Wiley, one of the world’s leading academic publishing companies, has recently announced plans to shutter 19 of its journals. This decision has sparked controversy and concern among the academic community, as these journals cover a wide range of disciplines and are relied upon by researchers around the world.

The journals in question cover a variety of subjects, including chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. Wiley has stated that the decision to close these journals was based on a review of their overall performance and impact within their respective fields. The company claims that the move is part of a broader effort to streamline its portfolio and focus on high-impact journals that reach a larger audience.

While Wiley has indicated that the content from the shuttered journals will still be accessible through its online platform, many researchers are worried about the implications of this decision. Some fear that important research findings may be lost or overlooked, while others are concerned about the potential impact on their own work and careers.

Critics of Wiley’s decision argue that the company is prioritizing profits over the dissemination of knowledge and the advancement of research. They argue that the closure of these journals will limit the diversity of voices and perspectives in academic publishing, and could have a negative impact on the overall quality of scholarly work.

In response to the backlash, Wiley has stated that it is committed to supporting the affected researchers and ensuring that their work continues to reach a wide audience. The company has also promised to provide additional resources and support to researchers who may be impacted by the closure of these journals.

Overall, the decision by Wiley to shutter 19 journals has sparked a debate within the academic community about the future of academic publishing and the role of commercial publishers in shaping the landscape of scholarly communication. It remains to be seen how this decision will impact researchers and the broader academic community in the long term.

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
Previous post When Trustees Run for Public Office
Next post Career Prep Tip: Workforce Simulations for Experiential Learning